Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2009 » October » 29

Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction policies.. would it help, other possible solution?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Joachim Schipper
Subject: Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction policies.. would it help, other possible solution?
Date: Thursday, October 29, 2009 - 1:16 pm

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 02:57:14PM -0500, Matthew Young wrote:

Any decent proxy server accepts the CONNECT method, which means that it
basically passes the data through after validating the hostname - i.e.
GMail handles its own SSL.

I believe that work is currently underway to make it possible for
multiple SSL-enabled hostnames to share a single IP address, but it will
probably be quite a few years before this is remotely common.

		Joachim
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction policies.. ..., Matthew Young, (Thu Oct 29, 12:42 pm)
Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction polici ..., Bob Beck, (Thu Oct 29, 12:50 pm)
Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction polici ..., Matthew Young, (Thu Oct 29, 12:57 pm)
Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction polici ..., Bob Beck, (Thu Oct 29, 12:59 pm)
Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction polici ..., James Records, (Thu Oct 29, 1:07 pm)
Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction polici ..., Bob Beck, (Thu Oct 29, 1:13 pm)
Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction polici ..., Brad Tilley, (Thu Oct 29, 1:14 pm)
Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction polici ..., Joachim Schipper, (Thu Oct 29, 1:16 pm)
Re: PF challenge dealing with HTTPS URL restriction polici ..., xSAPPYx, (Thu Oct 29, 2:27 pm)