Jason Dixon wrote:
> As marco already stated, it could be a kernel module. But it won't.
> Why? Because nobody will write it.Who is nobody anyway? I see he has an account on quite a lot of
computers, but I've never met the guy himself. He must be extremely
lazy if you're already saying that it won't be done *because* nobody
is writing it; this sounds like it should offend nobody very much,
possibly to the degree that he will write ZFS support into OpenBSD
simply to despite you.Where does nobody live? I'd love to buy him a beer!
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Srivatsa Vaddagiri | containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 6/7] [CCID-2/3]: Fix sparse warnings |
