On Jan 15, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> The hammer FS seems promising from the BSDtalk Will & Matthew did.
Outside of a single person who's doing porting (to an unknown OS),
there's not been much in the way of updates on the status. It's a BETA
filesystem at best, and still being tested with the 2.0 release of
DragonFly.2.1 seems promising, but HAMMER doesn't seem as well developed as one
might hope.http://gitweb.dragonflybsd.org/dragonfly.git?a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s...
FWIW, there's no license restriction I spotted in DragonflyBSD that
would prevent it being ported, if one were motivated to.
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Can E. Acar | Re: Wasting our Freedom |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| PJ Waskiewicz | [ANNOUNCE] ixgbe: Data Center Bridging (DCB) support for ixgbe |
