On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 05:38:32PM +0000, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
HAMMER is a completely different beast. From my understanding, it
attempts to avoid failures through clustering. But it doesn't have the
resiliency to avoid data corruption, nor the recovery functionality, of
ZFS.
There was a thread recently on dragonfly-users that covered much of
this.
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2009-01/msg00058.html
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net/
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
