Stefan Sczekalla wrote:
quoted text
> Hi Lurent,
> 
> e.g. :
> 
> you join two companies ( lets name them "A" and "B" ) using overlapping
> private adress-space.
> 
> Lets assume "A" has a Fileserver.A at 192.168.2.1. 
> 
> Users on Company B like to acces Fileserver.A using - but at "B" they
> have their Mailserver.B at 192.168.2.1.
> So the network form Company A needs to be hidden behind NAT so that
> 192.168.2.1 at A is accessed by something else from B using e.g.
> 192.168.202.1.  ( or any other feasible address ).
> 
> And beause "A" has several 1000 Systems which should be accessed by "B"
> it would be a big deal when querying the DNS from A - would lead to a
> response with a NATted IP-Address "B" could use instead the "real" A
> IP-Address which are paritally in use at "B" too. 


I think your best option is to use bind views.

Don't you think so ?