On Wednesday 10 September 2008 15:58:03 Kevin Neff wrote:
This is nearly complete bullshit. For any individual, learning
their characteristics could give rise to being able to know a
great deal about what they are doing, but hardly for the
general case.
I know people who type blindingly fast. I'm a mutant hunt
'n pecker, but I can go 50wpm+ when on a good keyboard and
awake, and far slower then conditions aren't good. I also have
a problem with my right hand which makes for typing problems
at times.
How about people with severe physical problems? I know a C4
quadrapledgic who types slowly, very slowly. Depending on how
he feels, his speed varies by probably a factor of 4 or so.
Such a system could learn for an individual if you know things
about them. But what about a Chord keyboard? Dvorak?(sp)
If you want to worry, think about the sounds a keyboard makes.
Get an old IBM "buckling spring" keyboard (original PC and AT)
and listen to the sounds it makes. That is something you
could probably decode with decent accuracy.
--STeve Andre'
| Theodore Tso | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan... |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [0/45] x86 2.6.24 patches review I |
git: | |
| Wenji Wu | RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
