On Wednesday 10 September 2008 15:58:03 Kevin Neff wrote:
This is nearly complete bullshit. For any individual, learning
their characteristics could give rise to being able to know a
great deal about what they are doing, but hardly for the
general case.
I know people who type blindingly fast. I'm a mutant hunt
'n pecker, but I can go 50wpm+ when on a good keyboard and
awake, and far slower then conditions aren't good. I also have
a problem with my right hand which makes for typing problems
at times.
How about people with severe physical problems? I know a C4
quadrapledgic who types slowly, very slowly. Depending on how
he feels, his speed varies by probably a factor of 4 or so.
Such a system could learn for an individual if you know things
about them. But what about a Chord keyboard? Dvorak?(sp)
If you want to worry, think about the sounds a keyboard makes.
Get an old IBM "buckling spring" keyboard (original PC and AT)
and listen to the sounds it makes. That is something you
could probably decode with decent accuracy.
--STeve Andre'
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Justin Piszcz | exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 / SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
