On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Kevin Neff wrote:
The paper itself is not accessible. Prima facie, this looked like a
technology-in-search-of-a-problem kinda thing to me. For now, it
sounds like bull.
However, there are atleast 10 references to keystoke
timing/characteristics. That this 'weakness' holds water is a
judgement call. Of course, one can make any kind of conclusion only
after studying the paper/references.
Hari
| Ingo Molnar | [announce] "kill the Big Kernel Lock (BKL)" tree |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Emmanuel Florac | RAID-1 performance under 2.4 and 2.6 |
| Con Kolivas | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
