Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » September » 10

altq on enc0?

Previous thread: Patching a SSH 'Weakness' by Kevin Neff on Wednesday, September 10, 2008 - 3:58 pm. (15 messages)

Next thread: Is it possible to add pppoe to a bridge? by Peter on Wednesday, September 10, 2008 - 4:20 pm. (2 messages)
[view original message]
From: Toni Mueller <openbsd-misc@...>
To: <misc@...>
Subject: altq on enc0?
Date: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 - 4:11 pm

Hi,


I've just discovered that this is unsupported.


How difficult would it be to add support for this?


TIA!


Kind regards,

--Toni++
[view original message]
From: Markus Friedl <markus.r.friedl@...>
To: Toni Mueller <openbsd-misc@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: altq on enc0?
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 4:05 am

why not just tag the packet on enc0 and altq on the 'real' interface?
[view original message]
From: Toni Mueller <openbsd-misc@...>
To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: altq on enc0?
Date: Thursday, September 11, 2008 - 12:19 pm

Hi,


this implies a 1:1 correspondence between the packets on enc0 and the,

in my case, ESP packets on the real interface, and the sequence of

operation: Packet -> enc0 -> real interface. I'm not sure whether or

not that is a wise assumption (what about fragmentation and

reassembly?), but if it is, there'd not be a problem. It also requires

the use of labels, if I understand correctly.


Kind regards,

--Toni++
Previous thread: Patching a SSH 'Weakness' by Kevin Neff on Wednesday, September 10, 2008 - 3:58 pm. (15 messages)

Next thread: Is it possible to add pppoe to a bridge? by Peter on Wednesday, September 10, 2008 - 4:20 pm. (2 messages)