Re: syslogd -a question

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stuart VanZee <StuartV@...>
Cc: Openbsd Misc (E-mail) <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 - 11:15 am

Stuart VanZee wrote:

Don't by any means take me as knowledgeable, I'm just a lurker, but I've
seen a few places where it has been suggested that NFS can be used in a
chroot environment to make things tidier and to provide a way for things
in a chroot to get to non-chroot things. EG if you were to export an NFS
share which contained the necessary socket (and perhaps anything else
you fancied not having multiple copies of) and then mount it over
localhost within the chroot, might that solve your problem? That way,
syslog only has to pay attention to one extra socket, but many chroots
can write to it.

This might use more resources than other solutions, but at least it
doesn't require a recompile like Alexander Hall's MAXFUNIX tweak.

I'm assuming that sockets work over NFS of course. Anyone care to
correct me?

Dave W

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
syslogd -a question, Stuart VanZee, (Tue Aug 5, 3:20 pm)
Re: syslogd -a question, Dave Wilson, (Wed Aug 6, 11:15 am)
Re: syslogd -a question, Ted Unangst, (Wed Aug 6, 12:31 pm)
Re: syslogd -a question, Alexander Hall, (Wed Aug 6, 3:53 am)
Re: syslogd -a question, nate, (Wed Aug 6, 12:17 pm)