Re: Hardware recommendation for firewalls (more than 4 NICs)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Henning Brauer
Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 4:39 am

* Marco Fretz <mailinglist@blah.li> [2008-08-13 09:31]:

as in, lies, lies, lies.
They call it "marketing".


I can't second that. Cisco and good PC hardware are en par ime.
The whole system, Cisco + IOS vs PC-Server + OpenBSD - the latter is
ahead. Again, ymmv. I have had cisco routers crash upon typing "show
version".


what? that mess is nowhere near structured. It is not a config
language that was designed. It's an accident that happened.


no. If you have the money get somebody clueful to set your OpenBSD
routers up.

If you actually do route amny Gigabit/s worth of traffic things get a
bit complicated, you might have to go for juniper then.

But cisco... pah humbug.

-- 
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Hardware recommendation for firewalls (more than 4 NICs), Giancarlo Razzolini, (Fri Jul 11, 9:09 pm)
Re: Hardware recommendation for firewalls (more than 4 NICs), Jacob Yocom-Piatt, (Sat Jul 12, 8:08 am)
Re: Hardware recommendation for firewalls (more than 4 NICs), Siegbert Marschall, (Mon Aug 11, 8:06 am)
Re: Hardware recommendation for firewalls (more than 4 NICs), Henning Brauer, (Wed Aug 13, 4:39 am)