Re: Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: bofh <goodb0fh@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2008 - 1:17 pm

On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 12:22:17PM -0400, bofh wrote:

Hehehe ;)

Furthermore you can see in the US-CERT that this VULN was:

Date First Published 07/08/2008 02:46:15 PM

As you know some developers may live outside .us in a different
timezone (and developers in .us/.ca have to work at this time).
So in e.g. Europe this was yesterdays evening.

You can accelerate proceedings by a) donating to OpenBSD
and b) - if you need this patch REALLY FAST - hire a paid
conslutant to develope the patch and send it to the list.

And OpenBSD doesn't have a SLA ...

So long,

Andreas.

--
Windows 95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of
an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit
company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementati..., Giancarlo Razzolini, (Wed Jul 9, 1:06 pm)
Re: Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementati..., Daniel A. Ramaley, (Wed Jul 9, 12:35 pm)
Re: Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementati..., Andreas Maus, (Wed Jul 9, 1:17 pm)