Vous m'avez dit ricemment :
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:52:39PM +0200, Mathieu SEGAUD wrote:
good to know. thanks. thus "potentially"
> Without specifics on the issue, I can't tell if OpenBSD's bind is truly
Stuart Henderson already answered this question on misc@ (12:10 UTC,
today). Named is vulnerable. The resolver is not :)
--
Mathieu
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| David Miller | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [patch] sched_clock(): cleanups |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
