On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:10:09 +0200, Andreas Maus wrote:
>Hi.

quoted text
>

>I guess OpenBSDs named is affected by the actual issue:

>

>http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-1447

>http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/800113

>

>So I hope a patch is in progress ?

>Or is OpenBSD not affected by this issue?

>

>So long,

>

>Andreas.

>-- 

# tcpdump -nettti rl0 dst port 53

tcpdump: listening on rl0, link-type EN10MB

Jul 09 19:48:27.786683 00:01:80:0f:2b:94 00:00:24:c6:18:85 0800 70:

192.168.80.4.16284 > 192.168.80.1.53: 57120+ A? pps.com.au. (28)

Jul 09 19:48:43.690332 00:01:80:0f:2b:94 00:00:24:c6:18:85 0800 67:

192.168.80.4.1356 > 192.168.80.1.53: 32536+ A? ibm.com. (25)

Jul 09 19:49:11.013223 00:01:80:0f:2b:94 00:00:24:c6:18:85 0800 69:

192.168.80.4.14540 > 192.168.80.1.53: 29420+ A? intel.com. (27)

....
# uname -a

OpenBSD master.witworx.com 4.3 GENERIC#698 i386
Guess again.
Was that so hard to try?
R/

** note replies off-list are not required. If you insist you MUST use

the reply-to: address.

The sender address is a tarpit except for the list servers. ***
Rod/
A consultant is someone who's called in when someone has painted himself into a corner.  He's expected to levitate his client out of that corner.
-The Sayings of Chairman Morrow. 1984.