On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:01:50PM +0200, Martin Toft wrote:
To be a bit more specific than Theo, don't believe idiots like Ulrich
Drepper.
There's a *reason* for strlcpy and strlcat.
strncpy and strncat are bogus. They're almost never the solution.
Accept no substitute.
On any lesser system (and that's mostly linux these days), you must ship
a copy of strlcat and strlcpy.
Fortunately the source code for these is small!
And it's free!
nice licence!
no obnoxious GPL!
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Stoyan Gaydarov | From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [4/50] x86: add cpu codenames for Kconfig.cpu |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 013/196] Documentation: Replace obsolete "driverfs" with "sysfs". |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
