Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008 - 6:23 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

dermiste @ 2008/07/17 07:47:

i'm not quite sure what you're saying, but i'll give interpretation a try.

i'm not advocating flash over a fantastic alternative like xvid+vorbis.
the point is the masses use flash now. i don't know or care why it has
become popular as a medium, but it is. it is valuable in that it is not
just used for stupid videos mentioned above, which many people might
think, but is used for informative and other public service needs, like
is mentioned elsewhere in this thread about skydiving equipment.

if i had to guess i would compare it to your friendly government website
requiring internet explorer. they don't have the skilled staff to write
a web page based on standards since they have sold out to microsoft, so
they continue on the easy route and use some microsoft website builder
which breaks countless standards but is easy for them to implement. now
they are serving 90% of internet users with a public service which was
otherwise unavailable. meanwhile, the other 10% of people like us are
bitter. overall, though, a great benefit has been bestowed upon society
as a whole. blah blah viruses, blah blah security holes.. it obviuosly
doesn't matter if it is easy and serves a large majority.

and i'm not sure where content protection came into this or what it has
to do with anything. i hate content protection though, i'll say that much.

who are we to deny a user their right to the content on the internet? i
think we should stop arguing on moral grounds and put effort towards a
viable and secure solution to those without a microsoft operating system.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFIf8ZtXhfCJNu98qARCM8IAJ9XtBurknekhsa391d7c1UecrJ3tACgt6Zv
V4CMykPr3qLMNnaXLKy54OA=
=G8uy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Jim Razmus, (Tue Jul 15, 4:58 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Ed Ahlsen-Girard (TYBRIN Corp.)..., (Wed Jul 16, 12:21 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Marco Peereboom, (Wed Jul 16, 1:30 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Daniel W Barowy, (Wed Jul 16, 6:23 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Jason LaRiviere, (Wed Jul 16, 9:59 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Jason Dixon, (Thu Jul 17, 12:54 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Hannah Schroeter, (Thu Jul 17, 8:36 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Jason Dixon, (Thu Jul 17, 10:26 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, , (Thu Jul 17, 11:34 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Travers Buda, (Thu Jul 17, 1:29 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Marco Peereboom, (Wed Jul 16, 7:00 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Daniel Barowy, (Thu Jul 17, 9:47 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jul 17, 11:13 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, n0g0013, (Thu Jul 17, 2:07 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Edd Barrett, (Thu Jul 17, 2:33 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, n0g0013, (Thu Jul 17, 4:49 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Nick Guenther, (Thu Jul 17, 3:35 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, n0g0013, (Thu Jul 17, 5:03 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Russell Howe, (Fri Jul 18, 4:53 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jul 17, 7:49 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jul 17, 8:10 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Edd Barrett, (Thu Jul 17, 7:25 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jul 17, 2:21 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, n0g0013, (Thu Jul 17, 4:42 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jul 17, 6:43 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Brian, (Thu Jul 17, 10:38 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Dave Anderson, (Thu Jul 17, 11:59 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Jason Beaudoin, (Thu Jul 17, 12:40 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jul 17, 4:08 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Alphons "Fonz" van Werven..., (Thu Jul 17, 10:16 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Marco Peereboom, (Thu Jul 17, 11:06 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Alphons "Fonz" van Werven..., (Thu Jul 17, 12:09 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Gilles Chehade, (Thu Jul 17, 10:49 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Alphons "Fonz" van Werven..., (Thu Jul 17, 11:59 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Jason Beaudoin, (Thu Jul 17, 7:09 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Jason Dixon, (Thu Jul 17, 2:34 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, ropers, (Thu Jul 17, 6:33 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Karl Sjodahl - dunceor, (Thu Jul 17, 5:10 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, scar, (Thu Jul 17, 12:01 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, dermiste, (Thu Jul 17, 3:47 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, scar, (Thu Jul 17, 6:23 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Mark Pecaut, (Wed Jul 16, 5:38 pm)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Hannah Schroeter, (Thu Jul 17, 8:39 am)
Re: UPDATE: mozilla-firefox-3.0, Ingo Schwarze, (Tue Jul 15, 6:04 pm)