On 17.07-10:26, Jason Dixon wrote:

[ ... ]

quoted text
> I don't have any customers that use Java for client-side image

> rendering, so I can't speak as to how it would compare.  I suspect that

> Java wouldn't be as efficient as flash for passing instructions to the

> client, but that's just a hunch.

performance of "image rendering" ? ? ?

	"passing instructions" ???

that's as meaningful as the banana flavoured lube.

	;-)
java is a language, flash is a solution.
many would like to see an open alternative to flash but since flash

is "not microsoft" i think it's below most radars.  it's also, as many

here have noted, 99.9% meaningless junk; and i'm 100% confident that

any flash application could be re-implemented in Java, should needs,

must.
personally, i avoid flash as a retard filter; remove it and lots of

sh1t suddenly disappears.
p.s: java's "image rendering" is perfectly performant (assuming you

accept java as an overhead in the first place ... of course, flashplayer

is just as bad)