On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:18 PM, L. V. Lammert wrote:
> Thanks for making my point! There's no good reason why git should require
Now I understand why there's so many issues in the world. Love you way you
deliberately misinterpret my words. I hope that's not what you do as chief
scientist at work.
But your argument is correct. There's no good reason why git should require
X. Go bitch at the upstream for including Wish. Tell them to separate it
out into two packages. git and git-gui. Let us know what Linus tells you.
KTHXHAND
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." --
Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
"Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory
where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford
learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0&feature=related
| David Miller | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 13/37] dccp: Deprecate Ack Ratio sysctl |
