Re: GPL version 4

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Morton Harrow <mharrow@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 9:09 pm

> Most of the people who have replied seem to be missing the point.

I just don't know what you brought the discussion to this mailing
list. If it is of serious concern to you, and if you haven't realized
that he probably won't care (or agree), talk to rms about this.

Either way, it's all your freedom of choice.
But bringing the conversation here seemed pointless.

Regards,
~Jason

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: GPL version 4, Morton Harrow, (Wed Jul 16, 5:31 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, Alexandre Oliva, (Thu Jul 17, 7:21 am)
Re: GPL version 4, Rod Whitworth, (Thu Jul 17, 8:38 am)
Re: GPL version 4, Kasper Sandberg, (Wed Jul 16, 10:12 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, Jason Beaudoin, (Wed Jul 16, 9:09 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, Al Viro, (Wed Jul 16, 6:08 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, David Collier-Brown, (Wed Jul 16, 6:06 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, linux-os (Dick Johnson), (Thu Jul 17, 5:17 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, , (Wed Jul 16, 5:41 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, Mark Kirkwood, (Sun Dec 14, 5:12 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, Marco Peereboom, (Sun Dec 14, 8:27 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, Mark Kirkwood, (Sun Dec 14, 9:31 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, bofh, (Sun Dec 14, 9:44 pm)
Re: GPL version 4, Matthias Kilian, (Wed Jul 16, 6:23 pm)