Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: bofh
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 6:03 pm

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:41 PM, L. V. Lammert <lvl@omnitec.net> wrote:


Unfortunately, it appears that you don't get it.  I just downloaded the git
source code from the main repository.  it comes with a bunch of X related
things.  The INSTALL file talks about wish and git-gui.

This indicates that the main package requires X.  Marc's comments about not
wasting time is the correct thing.



Flavors is what enables the no_x11 option.  What do you not understand about
packages?  If CVS requires X, then it requires X.  You need to understand
OpenBSD's philosophy.  Why are services enabled that you will typically
disable while "hardening" a linux box?  It's in the FAQ.  That is why
OpenBSD's maintainers say, go ahead and install X if your package needs it.

In any case, it's in the maintainer's hands, as he has control. The point

As Marc indicated - lack of time or interest would be the primary reasons.


-- 
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." --
Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
"Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abuse - external or
internal - is akin to trying to install sprinklers in a fireworks factory
where smoking on the job is permitted." -- Gene Spafford
learn french: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1G-3laJJP0&feature=related
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, L. V. Lammert, (Tue Jul 15, 12:30 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Will Maier, (Tue Jul 15, 1:28 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Nick Guenther, (Tue Jul 15, 1:52 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Marc Espie, (Tue Jul 15, 2:30 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, L. V. Lammert, (Tue Jul 15, 3:51 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Jacob Meuser, (Tue Jul 15, 4:18 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Ted Unangst, (Tue Jul 15, 4:41 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Tony Abernethy, (Tue Jul 15, 4:59 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Marco Peereboom, (Tue Jul 15, 5:06 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Ted Unangst, (Tue Jul 15, 5:11 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, bofh, (Tue Jul 15, 5:39 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Darrin Chandler, (Tue Jul 15, 5:50 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Damien Miller, (Tue Jul 15, 6:11 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Ted Unangst, (Tue Jul 15, 6:51 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Bernd Ahlers, (Wed Jul 16, 12:54 am)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, L. V. Lammert, (Wed Jul 16, 7:27 am)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, L. V. Lammert, (Wed Jul 16, 7:30 am)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, L. V. Lammert, (Wed Jul 16, 7:32 am)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, William Boshuck, (Wed Jul 16, 10:44 am)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, L. V. Lammert, (Wed Jul 16, 12:08 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Marco Peereboom, (Wed Jul 16, 12:22 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Ted Unangst, (Wed Jul 16, 12:24 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Don Hiatt, (Wed Jul 16, 12:53 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Landry Breuil, (Wed Jul 16, 12:54 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Marc Espie, (Wed Jul 16, 4:10 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, L. V. Lammert, (Wed Jul 16, 5:41 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, Damien Miller, (Wed Jul 16, 5:52 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, bofh, (Wed Jul 16, 6:03 pm)
Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2, L. V. Lammert, (Wed Jul 16, 6:11 pm)