On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Nuno Magalhces
wrote:
I agree. This mailing list is an oven (and like an oven, comes out
with deliciousness in the end).
Anyway, I don't think of OpenBSD as a 'secure' system, I think of it
as a 'correct' system, and security is a side effect of that that's
good for marketing. Doesn't seem like Linus gets that. I could see
Linus' complaint better applied to SELinux or any of the thousands of
"hardened" linux distros, which try to build in security after the
fact and make a big deal of it.
-Nick
| Al Boldi | [RFD] Incremental fsck |
| Andi Kleen | kgdb in git-x86#mm review |
| Arnd Hannemann | 2.6.24-rc8 hangs at mfgpt-timer |
| David Miller | Re: [11/14] vcompound: Fallbacks for order 1 stack allocations on IA64 and x86 |
git: | |
| drew | Re: SVGA-alphanum. modes |
| Raymond Nijssen | Re: What the 17" monitor reviews never tell you |
| Paul Richards | Header files |
| Joseph R. Pannon | More install questions |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU |
