On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:47 PM, Nuno Magalhces
wrote:
I agree. This mailing list is an oven (and like an oven, comes out
with deliciousness in the end).
Anyway, I don't think of OpenBSD as a 'secure' system, I think of it
as a 'correct' system, and security is a side effect of that that's
good for marketing. Doesn't seem like Linus gets that. I could see
Linus' complaint better applied to SELinux or any of the thousands of
"hardened" linux distros, which try to build in security after the
fact and make a big deal of it.
-Nick
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 027/196] tifm: Convert from class_device to device for TI flash media |
| Kok, Auke | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| Trent Piepho | Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86: add Kconfig entry for DMA-API debugging |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
