That doesn't fix the main problem, however, .. a version control packageOn Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 7/15/08, L. V. Lammert wrote:
It was mentioned earlier that there is a non-X version in ports - why
don't the maintainers FIX the problem and make that the package instead of
all this bitching about why people compain about broken packages?
Lee
==============================================
Leland V. Lammert lvl@omnitec.net
Chief Scientist Omnitec Corporation
Network/Internet Consultants www.omnitec.net
==============================================
| David Newall | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Fernando Luis | [PATCH] affinity is not defined in non-smp kernels - x86_64 |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 28/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 3 (client side) |
| Jean-Louis Dupond | tg3 driver not advertising 1000mbit |
