Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2

Previous thread: Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2 by Tony Abernethy on Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 9:04 am. (1 message)

Next thread: Re: Identifying Bandwidth Hogs by Stuart Henderson on Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 7:08 am. (5 messages)
From: Tony Abernethy
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 8:07 am

Ted Unangst wrote:

The parallel argument is that if any GUI tool has a command line 
helper function, then that package is broken.
(Microsoft Windows still has a command line)
You might have a point of view, but it seems to me to be
extremely naive and provincial and almost certainly wrong.

From: Ted Unangst
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 8:57 am

I most certainly did not write that.

From: L. V. Lammert
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 12:10 pm

Sorry, that doesn't even make sense. Want to try again? What does the
wrong flavor in packages have to do with your comment?

	Lee

==============================================
 Leland V. Lammert            lvl@omnitec.net
  Chief Scientist        Omnitec Corporation
 Network/Internet Consultants www.omnitec.net
==============================================

Previous thread: Re: 'Nother broken package - git-1.5.4.2 by Tony Abernethy on Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 9:04 am. (1 message)

Next thread: Re: Identifying Bandwidth Hogs by Stuart Henderson on Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 7:08 am. (5 messages)