Re: Identifying Bandwidth Hogs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 - 7:48 am

Sean Malloy wrote:

I seem to recall it being said that the recent change if the pfsync
protocols (which pfflowd uses as its datasource) means that since 4.3
(possibly 4.2, I forget when the pfsync stuff went in) pfflowd doesn't
work any more on -stable. I could be wrong. Its a shame, as some of the
graphs that can be created from the netflow data are *really* useful.
They're pretty too, which is good for impressing managers.

Anyone fancy a little donation drive to encourage Damien Miller to
update pfflowd? I fear the issue is time rather than money, so it may
not do much good...

SD

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Identifying Bandwidth Hogs, David Schulz, (Wed Jul 9, 1:51 am)
Re: Identifying Bandwidth Hogs, Joe S, (Sun Jul 13, 8:02 pm)
Re: Identifying Bandwidth Hogs, Zamri Besar, (Mon Jul 14, 12:23 pm)
Re: Identifying Bandwidth Hogs, Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Mon Jul 14, 4:09 am)
Re: Identifying Bandwidth Hogs, Sean Malloy, (Fri Jul 11, 2:44 am)
Re: Identifying Bandwidth Hogs, Dave Wilson, (Wed Jul 16, 7:48 am)
Re: Identifying Bandwidth Hogs, Martin Schröder, (Wed Jul 9, 4:47 am)