Re: Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementations vulnerable to cache poisoning

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Pete Vickers writes:

> looks like there is some work in progress to update the in-tree BIND

reading tea leaves^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hsource-changes has me thinking
the BIND bug has spurred some activity in other parts of the tree, too
(as in, "bugs are never unique, in OpenBSD we look for patterns or
whole classes of bugs and fix them").

> As Theo points out, patience is a virtue, and it's the "+ local

AOL!

--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
"Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Vulnerability Note VU#800113 - Multiple DNS implementati..., Peter N. M. Hansteen, (Thu Jul 10, 4:24 am)