[...]On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:10:00PM -0700, my mail wrote:
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jul 8 14:27 libiconv-1.12
[...]
Yes, you mix -stable and -current. If you build from ports you should
use the same branch as the rest of your system (-stable).
The latest version of bash in -stable is 3.2.33, not 3.2.39. The later
one is in -current. When you build bash you seems to have pulled in
(build) the newer libiconv too. The latest version of libiconv in
-stable is 1.9.2p5.
You may read chapter 5 and 15 of the FAQ, especially
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun
Regards,
Markus
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interface for on access scan... |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Emmanuel Dreyfus | fixing send(2) semantics (kern/29750) |
| Christos Zoulas | Re: Melting down your network [Subject changed] |
| Juan RP | Changing the I/O scheduler on-the-fly |
| Emmanuel Dreyfus | Re: fixing send(2) semantics (kern/29750) |
