> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Jeremy Karlson wrote:
That could be correct. Honestly, I'm not sure. I believe you. :-P
But that's not the weird part to me.
[howl] error sending packet to 224.0.0.251 (23126)
[assert] error: 64 (Host is down)
That's the weird part. I'm admittedly not a networking guy, but I don't
see how a multicast can fail like this, especially when it's not directed
at any specific host. Care to enlighten me?
-- Jeremy
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Andi Kleen | Re: [PATCH] x86: Construct 32 bit boot time page tables in native format. |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: Possible regression in HTB |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
git: | |
