Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » June » 9

Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Damien Miller <djm@...>
To: James Hartley <jjhartley@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)
Date: Monday, June 9, 2008 - 7:07 pm

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, James Hartley wrote:


> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Marc Balmer  wrote:


ldattach is more generic; it can handle all existing and future line

discliplines
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8), Marc Balmer, (Mon Jun 9, 6:36 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., James Hartley, (Mon Jun 9, 6:53 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., James Hartley, (Mon Jun 9, 7:52 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., Mike Erdely, (Mon Jun 9, 8:04 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., Theo de Raadt, (Mon Jun 9, 7:14 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., bofh, (Mon Jun 9, 7:56 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., Damien Miller, (Mon Jun 9, 7:07 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., Marc Balmer, (Mon Jun 9, 7:07 pm)