Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » June » 9

Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Marc Balmer <marc@...>
To: James Hartley <jjhartley@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8)
Date: Monday, June 9, 2008 - 7:07 pm

* James Hartley wrote:


we do not want more than one utility to attach line disciplines.  and

ldattach(8) superseedes nmeaattach(8).  there is no need to keep

the latter.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldattach(8), Marc Balmer, (Mon Jun 9, 6:36 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., James Hartley, (Mon Jun 9, 6:53 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., James Hartley, (Mon Jun 9, 7:52 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., Mike Erdely, (Mon Jun 9, 8:04 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., Theo de Raadt, (Mon Jun 9, 7:14 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., bofh, (Mon Jun 9, 7:56 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., Damien Miller, (Mon Jun 9, 7:07 pm)
Re: nmeaattach(8) removed in -current, superseeded by ldatta..., Marc Balmer, (Mon Jun 9, 7:07 pm)