Re: isakmpd -- NCP IPsec client: peer proposed invalid phase 2 IDs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Stuart Henderson
Date: Monday, June 30, 2008 - 2:46 am

On 2008-06-30, Mitja Mu>enih <mitja@muzenic.net> wrote:

It would make more sense for isakmpd to treat IPV4_ADDR_SUBNET /32
and IPV4_ADDR as equivalent, otherwise I think you're unable to use
0.0.0.0 to accept dynamic IP peers that do this.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: isakmpd -- NCP IPsec client: peer proposed invalid pha ..., Stuart Henderson, (Mon Jun 30, 2:46 am)