On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 02:16:15PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 6/3/08, Juan Miscaro wrote:
Ted, I think you are confusing matters.
md5 is a cryptographic hash, it surely transforms text into bit soup,
but that is not not the same a an encryption function. For an
encryption function, you want to have a corresponding computationally
feasable decryption function. For hashes you're better off if no such
function exists. Also, many texts have the same md5 output. For an
encryption function that would be a major problem.
-Otto
| Davide Libenzi | [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 018/196] coda: convert struct class_device to struct device |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| David Newall | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
git: | |
| Christoph Lameter | Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
