On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 08:45:59AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:36:11PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
> > Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
> > of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?
> > 
> > One would be violating the copyright law regardless what name the said
> > code is released under right? I mean, a third party won't be able to
> > claim that they are the anonymous person unless they provide evidence,
> > otherwise they can't change the license or do anything not permitted
> > by the license, right?
> 
> I didn't claim it was a good idea.
> 
> Anyway, this is all theoretical.

True. I've been arguing for public domain dedication before. But you'll
get an infinet discussion about the legal value of public domain etc. I
just stuck with ISC because public domain is not worth all the
discussion.