I didn't claim it was a good idea.

Anyway, this is all theoretical.

On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:36:11PM +1000, Sunnz wrote:
quoted text
> Well if you prove that you wrote it then that would defeat the purpose
> of releasing it under the name of anonmyous would you?
> 
> One would be violating the copyright law regardless what name the said
> code is released under right? I mean, a third party won't be able to
> claim that they are the anonymous person unless they provide evidence,
> otherwise they can't change the license or do anything not permitted
> by the license, right?