Re: sloppy states and dsr

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ted Unangst <ted.unangst@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Friday, June 20, 2008 - 8:24 pm

On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:47:18PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
| One would only use sloppy state tracking on the load balancer, right?
| The firewall in front of everything still uses normal tracking?

This is why the router should also be running pf/OpenBSD ;)

Cheers,

Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd

--

+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
sloppy states and dsr, Ted Unangst, (Fri Jun 20, 2:47 pm)
Re: sloppy states and dsr, Henning Brauer, (Mon Jun 30, 8:33 pm)
Re: sloppy states and dsr , Theo de Raadt, (Tue Jul 1, 2:35 am)
Re: sloppy states and dsr, Paul de Weerd, (Fri Jun 20, 8:24 pm)
Re: sloppy states and dsr, Pierre-Yves Ritschard, (Fri Jun 20, 2:58 pm)
Re: sloppy states and dsr, Darrin Chandler, (Fri Jun 20, 3:49 pm)
Re: sloppy states and dsr, Ryan McBride, (Fri Jun 20, 8:12 pm)
Re: sloppy states and dsr, Darrin Chandler, (Fri Jun 20, 8:58 pm)