Re: vsftpd [more secure]

view
thread

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Joe S <js.lists@...>

To: Saulo Bozzi <psykhe6@...>

Cc: <misc@...>

Subject: Re: vsftpd [more secure]

Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 4:17 pm

no version of ftp software is "secure"
Try "man sftp"
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Saulo Bozzi  wrote:

quoted text> *Name* *Version*

>

>

>

>

>

>  vsftpd  1.1.3

>

>

>

>

>  vsftpd  1.2.2

>

>

>

>

>  vsftpd  1.2.2

>

>

>

>

>  vsftpd  2.0.1

>

>

>

>

>  vsftpd  2.0.4

> what version should i use?

> what is more secure...the last version...2.0.6 or 2.0.4 or 1.3....?!

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

vsftpd [more secure], Saulo Bozzi, (Tue Jun 10, 9:45 am)

Re: vsftpd [more secure], Joe S, (Wed Jun 11, 4:17 pm)

Re: vsftpd [more secure], Janne Johansson, (Tue Jun 10, 10:16 am)

Re: vsftpd [more secure], Saulo Bozzi, (Tue Jun 10, 3:19 pm)

Re: vsftpd [more secure], Janne Johansson, (Wed Jun 11, 4:26 am)

Re: vsftpd [more secure], Saulo Bozzi, (Wed Jun 11, 8:29 am)

Re: vsftpd [more secure], Gilles Chehade, (Wed Jun 11, 8:42 am)

Re: vsftpd [more secure], Lord Sporkton, (Tue Jun 10, 3:51 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Greg KH	[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Tarkan Erimer	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Amit K. Arora	[RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
Chuck Ebbert	Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
git:

linux-netdev:
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Natalie Protasevich	[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by: