I wanted to make a correction here as I got a comment that puzzled me 
and that may have created a miss understanding on my part on the way I 
wrote my text.

If the perception have been taken by anyone as a complain, or otherwise 
I want to apologies for this!

It's possible that some may have taken it to mean bad things and if so I 
am very sorry for it and that sure wasn't the intend here.

If Marco took it as a complain as well I want to make sure I correct 
this and retract that as well as offering my public apology for that!

And just that I don't create an additional miss understanding, no Marco 
didn't comment to me in case anyone thought he did on this post.

Sure this wasn't my intention what so ever and far from it. There have 
been lots of chances and improvements and I thought testing the 
snapshots and reporting bugs was the intent if any?

The crash on the Sun X4100 M2 is an old issue and it may have been fix 
or may so, I tested it as well as to see if the new memory works too. I 
only wanted to report my tests that all is still working as it was for 
three of the kernel and that on the amd64 bsd.mp, the same issue was 
still present.

There was lots of thought at the time that ACPI may have major impact on 
this crash and looking at the source changes in the last few weeks there 
have been lots of changes there too.

So, I thought it was important to test it and report it.

Obviously I don't write well and some may have taken it as bad from my 
part witch really wasn't near my intention or thoughts when I wrote my 
previous report.

Again if anyone read something in it, that wasn't intentional for sure, 
then again I sure apologies for it!

More importantly as well if Marco took offense to it, I sure deeply 
regret that as well and accept my apology for that. It wasn't even near 
the intent of it.

I hope this clear any possible miss understanding from my post that sure 
wasn't there intentionally from me.

Daniel