Re: Sloppy states

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Henning Brauer <lists-openbsd@...>

To: <misc@...>

Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 - 10:43 pm

* Sam Fourman Jr. [2008-06-11 04:41]:

quoted text

> I also would like some insight on ,
> 1:) exactly what is sloppy states meant to do
> 2:) what are some specific instances where we should use sloppy states

that has just been explained. comes down to "don't".

> 3:) what is a case where it would be bad to use sloppy states.

pretty much any.

--
Henning Brauer, hb@bsws.de, henning@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Sloppy states, STeve Andre', (Tue Jun 10, 9:06 pm)

Re: Sloppy states, Henning Brauer, (Tue Jun 10, 10:42 pm)

Re: Sloppy states, STeve Andre', (Tue Jun 10, 11:34 pm)

Re: Sloppy states, Sam Fourman Jr., (Tue Jun 10, 10:38 pm)

Re: Sloppy states, Henning Brauer, (Tue Jun 10, 10:43 pm)


linux-kernel:
David Miller	Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Bart Van Assche	Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Heiko Carstens	Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
git:

linux-netdev:
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Jan Engelhardt	Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49
openbsd-misc:

Re: Sloppy states

Online users