login
Header Space

 
 

Re: PF Congestion and state table question

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Thursday, May 8, 2008 - 7:13 pm

On 2008-05-08, Steve Johnson <maillist@sjohnson.info> wrote:


cpu% in interrupt (which includes PF processing) will almost certainly 
spike higher than this instantaneous reading at times, leading to congestion.


do you need to scrub/random-id _all_ of the traffic, in+out, on all
interfaces?

you're natting on the network Henning suggested you 'set skip' on
aren't you... if you can live with that breaking to test, try the 'set
skip' anyway and see if it helps enough to be worth working out
something else for the nat.

btw personally I'd rather have all the information in the list post
than have to fetch it by http, I expect it's probably the same for others..
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Stuart Henderson, (Thu May 8, 7:13 pm)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Steve Johnson, (Fri May 9, 9:51 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Jordi Espasa Clofent, (Sat May 10, 5:13 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Steve Johnson, (Sat May 10, 8:29 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Sun May 11, 12:44 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Steve Johnson, (Sun May 11, 1:04 pm)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Sun May 11, 7:31 pm)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Jordi Espasa Clofent, (Mon May 12, 3:44 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Tue May 13, 5:57 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Jordi Espasa Clofent, (Tue May 13, 8:01 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Tue May 13, 11:00 am)
speck-geostationary