Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Sunnz
Date: Saturday, May 3, 2008 - 10:48 pm

2008/5/4 Marco Peereboom <slash@peereboom.us>:

Yes I know about this binary blob. Even FreeBSD users are forced to
use i386 on an AMD64 system just to use their damn blob.

Actually I used to run Linux on this computer so I can play with the
3D Compiz and stuff... but I just decided to switch to OpenBSD anyway,
because I think in the long term, running a blob free system is the
way to go.

But economically-wise, I would like to keep as many current hardware
as possible... because I thought the NV driver would at least have
good 2D support for getting through working with a simple desktop
environment, such as Xfce4.

In the end I guess it just boils down to the question that many people
have asked before... are there any down-to-Earth, non-fancy graphics
card you can get these days that works well with OSS, when you just
want a speedy desktop and don't particularly care about the 3D Compiz
stuff... is ATi really the way to go, if you just want a straight
forward desktop? Have ATi (or anyone) really got their docs going
without NDA, and are there actually exists drivers for them in the
latest release of OpenBSD. (4.3-release)

I mean, while I do want to keep as much hardware as possible, I can
still afford to buy one or two components, if they are actually truly
supporting OSS, it is a form of voting with my wallet I guess.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Sunnz, (Sat May 3, 3:48 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Jacob Meuser, (Sat May 3, 8:34 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Sunnz, (Sat May 3, 9:48 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Sunnz, (Sat May 3, 9:53 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Marco Peereboom, (Sat May 3, 12:18 pm)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Nenhum_de_Nos, (Sat May 3, 1:47 pm)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Adam Jacob Muller, (Sat May 3, 2:26 pm)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Marco Peereboom, (Sat May 3, 4:35 pm)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Nenhum_de_Nos, (Sat May 3, 9:59 pm)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Sunnz, (Sat May 3, 10:48 pm)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Benoit Chesneau, (Sun May 4, 12:49 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Marco Peereboom, (Sun May 4, 5:52 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Sunnz, (Sun May 4, 7:42 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Marco Peereboom, (Sun May 4, 8:16 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Marc Espie, (Sun May 4, 8:56 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Sunnz, (Sun May 4, 9:04 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Marco Peereboom, (Sun May 4, 9:13 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Nick Holland, (Sun May 4, 10:24 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Jacob Meuser, (Sun May 4, 11:44 am)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Marco Peereboom, (Sun May 4, 12:02 pm)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Jukka Ruohonen, (Sun May 4, 12:04 pm)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Nenhum_de_Nos, (Sun May 4, 12:17 pm)
Re: Is NV supposed to be SLOW?, Matthew Szudzik, (Sun May 4, 1:05 pm)