Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: 'Glenn Becker' <burningc@...>
Cc: 'Craig Findlay' <craig@...>, <misc@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 9:13 pm

Glenn Becker wrote:

Quibble about the THEREFORE.

People who know how to program, born that way or otherwise,
know how to experiment and profit from mistakes.
Seems that it is only the people who do NOT know how to program
that assume that they cannot make mistakes
and do not need to experiment.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Jonathan Thornburg, (Tue May 27, 6:53 am)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 27, 12:41 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments , Theo de Raadt, (Tue May 27, 12:52 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Craig Findlay, (Tue May 27, 7:09 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 27, 9:07 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Pollywog, (Tue May 27, 7:55 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Tony Abernethy, (Tue May 27, 7:43 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Glenn Becker, (Tue May 27, 8:18 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Tony Abernethy, (Tue May 27, 9:13 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments , Theo de Raadt, (Tue May 27, 7:16 pm)