Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pollywog
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 4:55 pm

On Tuesday 27 May 2008 23:09:52 Craig Findlay wrote:

I think the advice should have been not to program *professionally* until one 
knows what he or she is doing.  Nobody is born a programmer.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Jonathan Thornburg, (Tue May 27, 3:53 am)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 27, 9:41 am)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments , Theo de Raadt, (Tue May 27, 9:52 am)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Craig Findlay, (Tue May 27, 4:09 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments , Theo de Raadt, (Tue May 27, 4:16 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Tony Abernethy, (Tue May 27, 4:43 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Pollywog, (Tue May 27, 4:55 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Glenn Becker, (Tue May 27, 5:18 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 27, 6:07 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Tony Abernethy, (Tue May 27, 6:13 pm)