Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » May » 27

Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Craig Findlay <craig@...>
To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 7:09 pm

Theo de Raadt wrote:


>


Hmmm, not sure if I agree with that, I no one ever tried to do things

that they can't do, the world would be a sorry place.


Craig
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Jonathan Thornburg, (Tue May 27, 6:53 am)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 27, 12:41 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments , Theo de Raadt, (Tue May 27, 12:52 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Craig Findlay, (Tue May 27, 7:09 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 27, 9:07 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Pollywog, (Tue May 27, 7:55 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Tony Abernethy, (Tue May 27, 7:43 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Glenn Becker, (Tue May 27, 8:18 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Tony Abernethy, (Tue May 27, 9:13 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments , Theo de Raadt, (Tue May 27, 7:16 pm)