Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ted Unangst <ted.unangst@...>
Cc: Jonathan Thornburg <J.Thornburg@...>, <misc@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 - 12:52 pm

> On 5/27/08, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:

I agree with Ted. I think it is obvious, and does not need to be
stated. The manual pages describe the algorithm in sufficient detail.

If you can't program, then please -- don't program.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Jonathan Thornburg, (Tue May 27, 6:53 am)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 27, 12:41 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments , Theo de Raadt, (Tue May 27, 12:52 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Craig Findlay, (Tue May 27, 7:09 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Ted Unangst, (Tue May 27, 9:07 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Pollywog, (Tue May 27, 7:55 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Tony Abernethy, (Tue May 27, 7:43 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Glenn Becker, (Tue May 27, 8:18 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments, Tony Abernethy, (Tue May 27, 9:13 pm)
Re: strlcat/strlcpy vs overlapping arguments , Theo de Raadt, (Tue May 27, 7:16 pm)