Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » May » 26

Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Ted Unangst <ted.unangst@...>
To: Martin Marcher <martin@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?]
Date: Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 10:28 pm

On 5/24/08, Martin Marcher  wrote:


How about them Yankees?


> Given that is


No.
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?], Martin Marcher, (Sat May 24, 12:23 pm)
Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?], Ted Unangst, (Sun May 25, 10:28 pm)
Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?], Denis Doroshenko, (Mon May 26, 2:23 am)
Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?], Marc Balmer, (Sat May 24, 6:15 pm)
Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?], Marc Espie, (Sat May 24, 12:53 pm)
Re: [OT] Python License, Randal L. Schwartz, (Sat May 24, 12:41 pm)
Re: [OT] Python License [WAS: Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?], Steve Shockley, (Sat May 24, 12:39 pm)