Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: hyjial <hyjial@...>
Cc: <misc@...>
Date: Friday, May 23, 2008 - 3:37 am

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 03:23:17PM +0000, hyjial wrote:

Well, perl lives in src/gnu by mistake, since it has little to do with
gnu, but moving it would not help anything, since it would add lots of
noise to the CVS repository.

Actually, we don't frown all that much on the Artistic licence.
It is very much free compared to the obnoxious GPL.
If you read it carefully, the only thing the Artistic licence requires you
to do is not to misrepresent the software, by changing it without renaming
it.

As far as perl goes, it's about the only language that fit the bill.
The older pkg_* were totally impossible to maintain and extend, and
I needed a sensible script language that was in base.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, hyjial, (Thu May 22, 11:23 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Sat May 24, 1:39 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sat May 24, 8:34 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Denis Doroshenko, (Sun May 25, 4:40 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ? , Theo de Raadt, (Sat May 24, 9:33 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Han Boetes, (Fri May 23, 4:21 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Jeremy Huiskamp, (Fri May 23, 4:40 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sat May 24, 8:26 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Fri May 23, 3:37 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Almir Karic, (Fri May 23, 7:42 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Fri May 23, 9:24 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Balmer, (Fri May 23, 8:40 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Diana Eichert, (Fri May 23, 9:16 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Paul de Weerd, (Fri May 23, 10:09 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Fri May 23, 9:57 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Diana Eichert, (Fri May 23, 12:33 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Will Maier, (Fri May 23, 8:13 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Paul de Weerd, (Thu May 22, 5:47 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Adam Patterson, (Thu May 22, 8:55 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Paul de Weerd, (Fri May 23, 2:06 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sat May 24, 4:58 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Randal L. Schwartz, (Sun May 25, 11:01 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Randal L. Schwartz, (Fri May 23, 9:27 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Christer Solskogen, (Thu May 22, 3:35 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Mic J, (Thu May 22, 5:32 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Hugo Villeneuve, (Fri May 23, 8:20 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Sat May 24, 4:24 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Diana Eichert, (Thu May 22, 1:40 pm)