ropers wrote:
quoted text
> 2008/5/21 ropers <ropers@gmail.com>:
>>> On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Kendall Shaw <kshaw@kendallshaw.com> wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> I'm having a hard time understanding it. In many places they use 2
>>>> numbers, e.g. 2(21) or 232 (4,294,967,296). Can you understand what they
>>>> are saying?
>>
>> I am really heartened to see how quickly everybody here has responded
>> and pointed out the error and correction.
>>
>> I am less delighted that 3com, who I emailed about this probably over
>> 2 years ago, and who said they were going to look into this, *still*
>> haven't fixed their PDF.
>>
>> Maybe if everybody who responded to this thread were to email them as
>> well, *maybe* that would help.
> 
> Or we could just post some errata at
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Intro , where the PDF is liked.
> Would the FAQ maintainers be in favour of this? If so, then I could
> probably write a diff for http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html .

s/Or/And/
:)

sometimes, the best thing one can do with a bug is document it, which
may prompt people to say, "hey, that sucks!", and fix it.

Another solution would be to find/write a replacement document/site.
(HTML preferred over pdf).

Show me a diff.  I am not interested in the FAQ being a errata sheet
for someone else's document, but an advisory that the typography is
hosed would not be bad (a better resource would be..uh..better).

Nick.