login
Header Space

 
 

Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <misc@...>
Date: Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 11:23 am

Hi list !
Reading through OpenBSD's codebase, I have noticed that the code
living
under src/usr.sbin/pkg_add is written in Perl. Perl is distributed
under the Artistic license, though. The latter is not as permissive
as the BSD
license under which monst of OpenBSD is released. No doubt
that is the reason
why Perl lives in src/gnu.
Why have such a tool using a non-BSD package when
there was choice
not to do so ?
What technical reasons have lead the
developers to elect this
language ?
I am just curious about the fact and
didn't manage to find information
in tech@ and mis@ archives.
Thanks in
advance.
Hyjial.

__________________________________________________
Do You
Yahoo!?
En finir avec le spam? Yahoo! Mail vous offre la meilleure protection
possible contre les messages non sollicitis 
http://mail.yahoo.fr Yahoo! Mail
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, hyjial, (Thu May 22, 11:23 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Sat May 24, 1:39 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sat May 24, 8:34 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Denis Doroshenko, (Sun May 25, 4:40 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ? , Theo de Raadt, (Sat May 24, 9:33 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Han Boetes, (Fri May 23, 4:21 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Jeremy Huiskamp, (Fri May 23, 4:40 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sat May 24, 8:26 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Fri May 23, 3:37 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Almir Karic, (Fri May 23, 7:42 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Fri May 23, 9:24 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Balmer, (Fri May 23, 8:40 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Diana Eichert, (Fri May 23, 9:16 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Paul de Weerd, (Fri May 23, 10:09 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Fri May 23, 9:57 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Diana Eichert, (Fri May 23, 12:33 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Will Maier, (Fri May 23, 8:13 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Paul de Weerd, (Thu May 22, 5:47 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Adam Patterson, (Thu May 22, 8:55 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Paul de Weerd, (Fri May 23, 2:06 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Douglas A. Tutty, (Sat May 24, 4:58 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Randal L. Schwartz, (Sun May 25, 11:01 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Randal L. Schwartz, (Fri May 23, 9:27 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Christer Solskogen, (Thu May 22, 3:35 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Mic J, (Thu May 22, 5:32 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Hugo Villeneuve, (Fri May 23, 8:20 pm)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Marc Espie, (Sat May 24, 4:24 am)
Re: Why Perl for pkg_* tools ?, Diana Eichert, (Thu May 22, 1:40 pm)
speck-geostationary