On Fri, 16 May 2008 17:48:47 -0400
Daniel Ouellet <daniel@presscom.net> wrote:

quoted text
> Rico Secada wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 May 2008 22:35:00 +0200
> > chefren <chefren@pi.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but
> >> so far, I still haven't find anything that I need that OpenBSD
> >> can't shine doing.
> > 
> > I can almost second that except for the few cases in which we really
> > need to update stuff without fuzz, then we use Debian.
> 
> All I need and use are in packages and using current and the pkg_add
> to updates couldn't be easier and faster. I find it a lots faster and 
> easier then app_get from Debian, but that's the beauty of it all. You 
> choose what you feel is right for you.

Yes :-) but I was mainly talking about the basesystem and kernel. About
it being more easy and more fast than apt-get from Debian, I have yet
to witness that :-)

quoted text
> And in some cases, release is just find and it's not liek I need the 
> latest all the time for each packages either. A properly 6 months
> fresh reinstall on all always provides best results and fix what ever
> bugs in between that may happened.
> 
> I still haven't switch some desktop to OpenBSD yet because of some 
> stupid Microsoft customers requirements, but as far as servers are 
> concern, hell OpenBSD beat all for me anyway. >140 servers and keep 
> counting. I couldn't sleep better.
> 
> And I should also say for the desktop there is a little bit of
> slacking on my part too, to switch to it. I still haven't find an
> easy way to setup window manager as easy as doing servers. but most
> likely may be my lack of spending time to learn it as well too.