On May 16, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
It's helpful for others if you explain what your mistake was. Bonus
points for posting your corrected ruleset. Your learning helps others
as well.
> When I did changes on the /etc/pf.conf, I relaunched the PF
No, nat is a PF feature.
---
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
