login
Login / Register
Header Space

 
 

Home » Mailing list archives » openbsd-misc » 2008 » May » 13

Re: PF Congestion and state table question

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Jordi Espasa Clofent <jordi.espasa@...>
To: <misc@...>
Subject: Re: PF Congestion and state table question
Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 - 8:01 am

> that's the CURRENT lenand almost always 0, becuase if it is not, we 

So, I understand it's a right value.


Mmmmm.... I'm not sure if I'm understood you correctly. ?Do you think 
it's a lower value? ?Why?
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Stuart Henderson, (Thu May 8, 7:13 pm)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Steve Johnson, (Fri May 9, 9:51 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Jordi Espasa Clofent, (Sat May 10, 5:13 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Steve Johnson, (Sat May 10, 8:29 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Sun May 11, 12:44 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Steve Johnson, (Sun May 11, 1:04 pm)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Sun May 11, 7:31 pm)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Jordi Espasa Clofent, (Mon May 12, 3:44 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Tue May 13, 5:57 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Jordi Espasa Clofent, (Tue May 13, 8:01 am)
Re: PF Congestion and state table question, Henning Brauer, (Tue May 13, 11:00 am)

Mail archive search
Enter your search terms.
Optionally limit your search to a specific mailing list.
advanced
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently 3 users and 1071 guests online.

Online users

Syndicate
Syndicate content
© 2007 KernelTrap.  |  Powered by Drupal.  |  Legal statement.
speck-geostationary